For my initial concept I wanted to explore the idea of homosexuality and whether or not DNA is related or even relevant as a contribution of a persons sexuality. Whether it is a hereditary or simply just a life style.
Whilst researching I stumbled across many statements along the route of;
Columbia University psychiatry professors Drs. William Byrne and Bruce Parsons stated: "There is no evidence that at present to substantiate a biological theory. [T]he appeal of current biological explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from dissatisfaction with the present status of psychosocial explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data".
Even though I don't find his theory incredibly influential to my initial thoughts to decipher an individuals sexuality to derive from being bored and dissatisfied with the norm is incredibly ridiculous. I'd imagine going against their theories and trying to sort out my own conclusion could be harder than I'd imagine. I am unsure of how exactly I'd find out the genetic half minus testing my entire family, even then, there would be no solid outcome that I could use to visually communicate a final outcome, I'd imagined to be an awareness poster.
Maybe it would be a great time to re-think my initial concept.
No comments:
Post a Comment